25 Years Later, The Ideology Of 9/11 Lives On
Conservative principles face implementation challenges as policy meets political complexity.
Twenty-five years later, we still treat 9/11 ideology like it’s a museum exhibit. A tragic relic. Then another “community group” shows up at a federal agency, another “charity” finds a way into the grant pipeline, and everyone acts surprised when the money trail points back to the same old networks.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The ideology that spawned America’s worst terror attack lives on through the Muslim Brotherhood, experts are warning. Recently, the Trump administration has begun targeting the Muslim Brotherhood’s international financial network, and some Republican lawmakers are calling on the administration to prevent CAIR from receiving federal grants.
The Muslim Brotherhood shares the same underlying principles of
Original source:
Read at Daily WireHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Twenty-five years later, we still treat 9/11 ideology like it’s a museum exhibit. A tragic relic. Then another “community group” shows up at a federal agency, another “charity” finds a way into the grant pipeline, and everyone acts surprised when the money trail points back to the same old networks. Ideas don’t die on a calendar. They adapt. They rebrand. They lawyer up.
The news hook here is that the Trump administration is going after the Muslim Brotherhood’s international financial network. Good. Not because it makes for a tough headline, but because that’s where the real battle is now: cash, connections, and legitimacy. Follow the money, or keep funding the problem. You can’t spend two decades telling the public the threat is “complex” and then pretend it’s impolite to ask who’s wiring funds, who’s laundering reputations, and who’s cashing federal checks.
That’s why the push from Republicans to block CAIR from receiving federal grants matters. If an organization wants taxpayer dollars, it should welcome scrutiny, not hide behind outrage. This is not about smearing every Muslim American. It’s about refusing to hand federal support to groups that may operate as influence machines for Islamist movements. Federal grants aren’t participation trophies. If the administration is serious about the Brotherhood’s reach, the grant spigot has to be part of the review, not an afterthought.
We’ve seen this movie: officials swear they’re “monitoring,” the media shifts the frame to “Islamophobia,” and the bureaucracy keeps cutting checks because it’s easier than asking hard questions. The country learned the hard way what happens when we confuse wishful thinking for vigilance. Going after financing networks and tightening grant standards is not overreaction. It’s the bare minimum of adult government.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.