The Trump Administration Might Actually Do Something Good About a Chronic Disease—Unless RFK Jr. Gets in the Way
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

The administration wants to invest more in research on a dangerous medical condition. Too bad RFK Jr. once called it a military bioweapon.
Read the original story:
SlateHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The recent coverage of the Trump administration's commitment to funding research on a chronic disease largely frames it as a political maneuver, with little appreciation for the genuine potential for medical advancement. Critics often overlook the importance of directing resources toward urgent health issues that affect millions, focusing instead on past controversies. This narrow lens misses a crucial point: investing in scientific research can lead to breakthroughs that save lives.
By painting skepticism towards initiatives that could alleviate suffering, the coverage fails to acknowledge the shared goal of improving public health. A robust approach to medical research not only tackles pressing health concerns but also underscores the conservative value of innovation through public-private partnerships. These initiatives have historically produced successful outcomes when grounded in strong governance and oversight.
Ultimately, the principle at stake is the necessity of trusting scientific inquiry as a key part of societal advancement. Advancing health care through thoughtful investments strengthens our communities and reflects a commitment to the well-being of all Americans.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

