Anarchist tech collective braces for investigation amid Trump’s terrorism crackdown

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: Washington Examiner
1 min read
Why This Matters

A web hosting outfit that proudly serves something called "Anarchist Federation" is suddenly nervous about a subpoena, and forgive us if the violins aren't coming out. No Gods No Masters Network says the DOJ went to Google for information on their operation, and they're framing this as some chilling assault on dissent. Maybe.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Anarchist tech collective braces for investigation amid Trump’s terrorism crackdown
Image via Washington Examiner

A web hosting service linked to anarchists says it is taking precautions over signs that it may be under a federal investigation. The Department of Justice sent a subpoena to Google for information on the No Gods No Masters Network, which hosts “Anarchist Federation” and other radical sites, the network claimed in an Aug. 17 […]

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

A web hosting outfit that proudly serves something called "Anarchist Federation" is suddenly nervous about a subpoena, and forgive us if the violins aren't coming out. No Gods No Masters Network says the DOJ went to Google for information on their operation, and they're framing this as some chilling assault on dissent. Maybe. Or maybe an administration that's actually treating domestic terrorism as a real category, not a rhetorical one, decided to look at the digital infrastructure that anarchist networks use to organize. Those aren't the same thing, and pretending they are is the whole game here.

There's a pattern to this kind of coverage. Any time law enforcement so much as glances at a group with "anarchist" in its branding, the story gets written as a crackdown on speech rather than a look at conduct. But hosting services aren't newspapers. They're plumbing. If the plumbing is being used to coordinate activity that crosses into violence or material support for it, a subpoena to a search engine for account information is about as basic and lawful as investigative steps get. Nobody's raiding a printing press over a pamphlet.

What's telling is how quickly "we host radical political content" gets recast as "we are being persecuted for our politics." Those two claims aren't interchangeable, and outlets sympathetic to the network seem happy to blur them anyway. If the investigation turns up nothing, fine, that's how investigations work. But treating the mere existence of a subpoena as proof of authoritarian overreach assumes the conclusion before anyone's seen the evidence.

We'd also just note the tell in the language. Groups that describe themselves as anarchist, that host content for outfits calling for the dismantling of the state, don't usually get to claim the state's scrutiny is illegitimate on principle. You can't organize against the government and then demand its total forbearance when it starts asking questions. Pick a lane.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.