Bail-hating NYC judge has knack for cutting accused criminals loose — even in attempted-slay cases: damning Post review
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
A judge with a family name in Albany politics keeps letting people accused of trying to kill other people walk out of her courtroom. That's not a talking point, that's the actual reporting here. More than a dozen cases reviewed, and the pattern isn't subtle: Janice Robinson finds a way to cut defendants loose even when the charge is attempted murder.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Brooklyn Criminal Court Judge Janice Robinson, the niece of a longtime Democrat state lawmaker, has consistently gone easy on many defendants, according to an examination of more than a dozen of her criminal cases.
Original source:
Read at New York PostHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
A judge with a family name in Albany politics keeps letting people accused of trying to kill other people walk out of her courtroom. That's not a talking point, that's the actual reporting here. More than a dozen cases reviewed, and the pattern isn't subtle: Janice Robinson finds a way to cut defendants loose even when the charge is attempted murder. At some point "consistently" stops being an adjective and starts being a description of a policy.
New Yorkers were told bail reform was about fairness, about not locking up poor people for shoplifting while they wait for a court date. Fine, there's a real argument in there somewhere. But nobody voted for a system where a judge treats attempted-slay cases like parking tickets. That's not compassion, that's a coin flip with someone else's safety, usually in a neighborhood that doesn't have the luxury of shrugging it off.
The niece detail matters too, whether people want to admit it or not. Brooklyn's court system doesn't run in a vacuum, and when the people making these calls are connected to the same political machine that pushed the reforms in the first place, "independent judiciary" starts to sound like a nice phrase nobody actually believes. Voters deserve to know who's on the bench and why they keep making the same call.
The fix isn't complicated. Judges who show a pattern of releasing people accused of violent crimes should face real scrutiny, not a shrug and a reassignment. Until that happens, expect more headlines like this one, and more victims wondering why the system worked so hard to protect the guy who tried to kill them.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

