BASE jumper who died in 700-foot cliff jump ID’d as

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: New York Post
1 min read
Why This Matters

They said the jumper “did not have enough lift with his wingsuit. ” That’s a clinical way to describe a tragedy. The man’s name is out now, and his family is grieving.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

BASE jumper who died in 700-foot cliff jump ID’d as
Image via New York Post

The jumper “did not have enough lift with his wingsuit,” officials said.

Original source:

Read at New York Post

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

They said the jumper “did not have enough lift with his wingsuit.” That’s a clinical way to describe a tragedy. The man’s name is out now, and his family is grieving. But in the retelling, what stands out is how matter-of-factly we reduce a human life to a physics problem.

There will be the usual calls for bans or tighter rules. It’s a reflex. Every time somebody dies doing something extreme, someone in government decides they know better. But BASE jumping is already illegal in many national parks, and that did not stop him. It won’t stop the next one, either. The point is that freedom includes the right to make your own bad decisions. We don’t have to celebrate the choice to respect the person who made it.

That respect is due now. He was a father, maybe a son, definitely a friend. He did not expect to die, but he knew the risk. That is more than can be said for the people who will use this tragedy to push for more government control. We should honor his memory by leaving the advice on the shelf.

What happened is sad, not confusing. He tried to fly off a cliff and the math didn’t work. Somewhere between the launch and the ground, he realized it. A moment later, it was over. That’s the whole story. There is no lesson that a committee can turn into a regulation, only a life that ended in the act of living it on his own terms. That earns a moment of silence, not a lecture.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.