Bush and Rice: We Feared Military Took Down Flight 93
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
That detail from George W. Bush and Condoleezza Rice lands like a weight: for a moment, they thought the military might have taken down Flight 93. Not because they wanted it to happen.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Former President George W. Bush and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said they initially thought the U.S. military had shot down United Airlines Flight 93 before it crashed in Pennsylvania during the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Both political figures reflected on where they were on Sept. 11, 2001, ahead of the 25th anniversary, as they […]
Original source:
Read at Washington ExaminerHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
That detail from George W. Bush and Condoleezza Rice lands like a weight: for a moment, they thought the military might have taken down Flight 93. Not because they wanted it to happen. Because on that morning, every horrible option was suddenly on the table, and nobody knew how many planes were still out there. That’s how close the country came to unthinkable choices.
It also reminds us how easy it is, years later, to flatten 9/11 into a single clean story. It wasn’t clean. It was chaos, bad information, and officials trying to make decisions in minutes that would normally take weeks, with the whole nation watching and dying. Bush and Rice admitting their first assumption tells you something uncomfortable and honest: they were bracing for an order that no president ever wants to give, and no American ever wants to hear. War-time decisions don’t arrive with a moral instruction manual.
And yes, the truth of Flight 93 still matters. The passengers fought back. They stopped that plane from reaching Washington. That courage is part of our national DNA, and it deserves to stand on its own without being turned into a political prop. But the fact that top leaders briefly feared a shootdown also speaks to what the left keeps trying to file away as “overreaction” whenever we talk about national security. For one day, the homeland was a battlefield, and leaders had to think like it.
As the 25th anniversary approaches, we’re going to get a lot of sanitized commemorations and a lot of selective amnesia. We’d rather get the truth, even when it’s ugly. We can honor the fallen and the heroes while still admitting how terrifying the fog was at the top. Remembering 9/11 honestly means remembering the fear, too..
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

