California moves to ban ‘shock gloves’ ICE plans to use

Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.

Source: New York Post
1 min read
Why This Matters

Sacramento just found a new way to tell the federal government it doesn't have to follow federal law. This time the vehicle is a pair of gloves. ICE reportedly wanted to test wearable electroshock devices for use in the field, and California lawmakers responded by banning the things outright, applying the ban not just to local police but to federal agents operating in the state.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

California moves to ban ‘shock gloves’ ICE plans to use
Image via New York Post

California Democrats passed a bill that would ban 'wearable electroshock devices' from being used by law enforcement anywhere in California, including federal agencies.

Original source:

Read at New York Post

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Sacramento just found a new way to tell the federal government it doesn't have to follow federal law. This time the vehicle is a pair of gloves. ICE reportedly wanted to test wearable electroshock devices for use in the field, and California lawmakers responded by banning the things outright, applying the ban not just to local police but to federal agents operating in the state. That's the part worth sitting with. This isn't a debate about whether shock gloves are a good idea. It's a state legislature deciding it gets to regulate equipment used by a federal agency doing federal immigration enforcement.

Maybe shock gloves turn out to be a bad idea. Fine, have that argument on the merits, in Congress, with hearings and evidence about injury rates and misuse. What California did instead was skip the argument and just assert jurisdiction over a federal agency's equipment choices. If a state can tell ICE what it's allowed to strap on before showing up to do its job, there's no obvious stopping point. Next year it's vehicles, or communication gear, or arrest procedures, all dressed up as "public safety."

We'd have a lot more patience for this if California's objection were really about the gloves. It isn't. It's about ICE, full stop, and the gloves are just this month's chosen fight. Lawmakers know a straightforward "we refuse to let federal agents operate here" wouldn't survive a legal challenge, so they're doing it piecemeal, equipment by equipment, hoping the cumulative effect adds up to the same thing without ever saying so out loud.

The irony is that a state this committed to undermining immigration enforcement rarely spends the same energy on the actual public safety problems it's supposed to be managing. Picking a fight over shock gloves is easy. It gets headlines, it signals virtue to the base, and it costs the state nothing. Actually enforcing the law, even the parts Sacramento doesn't like, would cost something. That tradeoff tells you most of what you need to know about the priorities here.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.