China state media previews Xi agenda for summit
Strategic competition with Beijing demands clarity on American commitments and economic leverage.
The Chinese Communist Party's flagship newspaper is telling its people not to worry so much about a war with America, and that alone tells you everything about how the past few years have gone. When Beijing's official mouthpiece feels the need to walk back the "two nations are headed for conflict" chatter before a summit, it means President Trump's pressure campaign is landing exactly where it hurts. The other side isn't spending column inches on this stuff because things are going great for them.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Beijing's strategy for the upcoming summit between President Trump includes an effort to overcome a questionable theory that the two nations are headed for war, according to the Chinese Communist Party's flagship newspaper.
Original source:
Read at Washington TimesHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The Chinese Communist Party's flagship newspaper is telling its people not to worry so much about a war with America, and that alone tells you everything about how the past few years have gone. When Beijing's official mouthpiece feels the need to walk back the "two nations are headed for conflict" chatter before a summit, it means President Trump's pressure campaign is landing exactly where it hurts. The other side isn't spending column inches on this stuff because things are going great for them.
This is the part the foreign policy crowd in Washington refuses to admit: China's nervousness is a feature, not a bug. For decades, the playbook was to assume engagement would soften Beijing's edges. Instead, it funded their military build-up and let them flood our markets while our manufacturing base hollowed out. Trump's tariff-first approach and willingness to talk from a position of strength changed the calculation. Now the CCP has to manage its own public's expectations before the leader sits down with him. They're not prepping their citizens for a friendly chat; they're prepping them for a tough negotiation, and preemptively blaming the whole thing on "questionable theories" so they have an excuse if they have to give ground.
The summit itself will be theatre. There will be grand photo ops and solemn statements about "constructive dialogue." But watch what happens after the cameras leave, not what's said in front of them. The real story is that China shows up at all. They could ignore us, call our bluff, and wait out the election cycle. Instead, they're sending their premier to the table because the alternative — continued tariffs and a united America First front — costs them more than swallowing their pride.
We should welcome the meeting, but we shouldn't pretend it's a reward for good behavior. It's a sign that the pressure is working. The left will frame any deal as a sellout or any impasse as a failure, but they've been wrong about this president's foreign policy from day one. Trump's gamble was that America's leverage was being squandered by polite diplomats who cared more about their reputations in Davos than they did about American workers. The gamble has paid off, and the other side's own newspapers are the proof. Now comes the hard part: closing the deal without giving away the store.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

