David Crowley Would Make Wisconsin a Safe Haven for Illegal Aliens
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
David Crowley just won his primary, and the first thing we’re supposed to believe is that he’s a “safe haven for illegal aliens. ” That’s the headline. Then you get into the actual copy, and it’s mostly about something else entirely: defunding the police, repealing Act 10, and raising taxes.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Shortly after Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley won the Democrat primary, we learned that Crowley really wasn't all that different from his socialist opponent, Francesca Hong. In fact, Crowley himself said there wasn't much daylight between his policy positions and hers.
This includes defunding the police, repealing Act 10, and raising taxes on hardworking Wisconsin families.
Original source:
Read at TownhallHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
David Crowley just won his primary, and the first thing we’re supposed to believe is that he’s a “safe haven for illegal aliens.” That’s the headline. Then you get into the actual copy, and it’s mostly about something else entirely: defunding the police, repealing Act 10, and raising taxes. Those are real fights with real consequences, and they deserve to be argued straight. So why lead with immigration if the story doesn’t bother to show the receipts?
Crowley saying there “wasn’t much daylight” between him and Francesca Hong is a useful nugget, because it tells voters not to expect a sudden pivot to the middle just because the primary is over. If you’re worried about Milwaukee County sliding into softer policing and higher spending, that line matters. But it’s still not evidence of anything on immigration. If the charge is “safe haven,” then point to a policy: cooperation with ICE, detainer practices at the county jail, guidance to county employees, anything. Otherwise it’s a label stapled on for effect.
On the substance the piece does raise, we’ll say it plainly: defunding police after the last few years is a terrible bet. Repealing Act 10 is not some symbolic gesture either; it’s a direct shot at the reforms that helped local governments control costs without constantly coming back to taxpayers with their hand out. And “raising taxes on hardworking Wisconsin families” isn’t a throwaway line if you can show where the money would go, who pays, and what gets cut if it doesn’t happen. That’s the argument voters can actually evaluate.
We’re America First and we’re not shy about wanting immigration laws enforced. But we also want arguments that hold up. If Crowley is going to run Milwaukee County like a progressive wish list, say that and prove it, point by point. If he’s going to turn county government into a magnet by refusing cooperation with federal law enforcement, prove that too. Wisconsin voters don’t need more heat; they need clarity.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

