Democrats Press RFK Jr. on an Ethics Agreement Change Involving

Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.

Source: Medpagetoday
1 min read
Why This Matters

rifling through Secretary Kennedy’s paperwork looking for a change to an ethics agreement that nobody outside their offices likely cared about until this week. The complaint seems to boil down to a minor adjustment that they think might violate a promise he made during his confirmation. This is the same crowd that told us for years that we had to trust the "experts" and the "process" — until a process-minded outsider comes in and starts questioning their entire food and drug establishment.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Democrats Press RFK Jr. on an Ethics Agreement Change Involving
Image via Medpagetoday

(MedPage Today) -- Congressional Democrats are pressing for answers from Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over what they describe as a previously undisclosed change to the ethics agreement he made before being confirmed, which they say calls

Original source:

Read at Medpagetoday

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

rifling through Secretary Kennedy’s paperwork looking for a change to an ethics agreement that nobody outside their offices likely cared about until this week. The complaint seems to boil down to a minor adjustment that they think might violate a promise he made during his confirmation. This is the same crowd that told us for years that we had to trust the "experts" and the "process" — until a process-minded outsider comes in and starts questioning their entire food and drug establishment.

What’s really happening here is an attempt to judge the man by his paperwork instead of his policy. Kennedy is in the middle of trying to clean up an agency that has spent decades cozying up to the pharmaceutical industry. He’s taking on the food additives, the processed junk, and the vaccine schedule that the left has treated as untouchable dogma. Rather than debate him on those ideas, they are sending letters about procedural footnotes. It’s a classic Washington move: if you can’t beat the argument, bury the messenger in document requests.

The change in the agreement is likely a technicality that any lawyer could argue either way. But the timing tells you everything. They didn't have a problem with it when they were grilling him in hearings. They found it right around the time he started making actual headlines for taking an axe to the agency’s sacred cows. The obsession with ethics paperwork is a smokescreen for a group that has run out of actual arguments. The left wants to slow the agenda down long enough for the bureaucracy to circle the wagons and bleed the reform effort dry. We should be tired of this by now.

If this is the best they have, they should just say that. Tell the American people you want Robert Kennedy Jr. out because he’s disrupting the cartel. But don't pretend this is about some clause in an ethics form. This is about stopping the disruption — and they are terrified they might actually lose the fight. They know they can't beat him in the court of public opinion on the merits of raw milk or the side effects of certain drugs. So, they are dragging him back into the swamp of process. We hope he stays focused on the mission and lets the lawyers deal with the noise. The voters who wanted the system shaken up are rooting for him to ignore the distractions and keep swinging.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.