Democrats’ South Carolina presidential-primary scheme is a last-ditch effort to hold off the DSA
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
The Democratic National Committee has apparently decided that the way to fend off its own socialist wing is to rearrange the primary calendar again, this time putting South Carolina up front and hoping Black voters in the Palmetto State can serve as a firewall against whatever DSA-aligned candidate the base actually wants. It's the same trick they pulled to save Biden in 2020, dusted off because it worked once and nobody in the party leadership has a better idea. What's telling is what this admits out loud.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

The fix is in: The Democratic establishment thinks it’s hit upon a strategy both for keeping control of the party out of the DSA's hands and wresting the South away from Republicans.
Original source:
Read at New York PostHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The Democratic National Committee has apparently decided that the way to fend off its own socialist wing is to rearrange the primary calendar again, this time putting South Carolina up front and hoping Black voters in the Palmetto State can serve as a firewall against whatever DSA-aligned candidate the base actually wants. It's the same trick they pulled to save Biden in 2020, dusted off because it worked once and nobody in the party leadership has a better idea.
What's telling is what this admits out loud. The people running the DNC do not trust their own voters. They spent years lecturing the country about democracy being on the ballot, and now they're quietly engineering which states matter most so the primary electorate produces the "correct" nominee rather than whichever one actually wins the most votes in a fair process. That's not a conspiracy theory, it's the plan, reported plainly, by people who think it's clever.
There's also a strategic bet buried in here that deserves more scrutiny than it's getting. The idea that leaning harder on South Carolina helps Democrats "win back the South" assumes the same coalition that delivers a primary win translates into November wins in Georgia or North Carolina. Those are different electorates with different demands, and Democrats have been burned by that mismatch before.
None of this fixes the actual problem, which is that a growing chunk of the Democratic base doesn't want a moderate and doesn't want to be told to wait its turn again. Moving the furniture around doesn't change who's in the room.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

