DSA member says she has no problem supporting ‘secret Nazis’ under one condition

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: New York Post
1 min read
Why This Matters

Let that sentence sit for a second. A member of the Democratic Socialists of America just said, on the record, that she'd have no problem with Bernie Sanders or AOC being secret Nazis in their private lives, as long as they vote the right way in public. That's not a gotcha clip taken out of context.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

DSA member says she has no problem supporting ‘secret Nazis’ under one condition
Image via New York Post

"I don't really care if say like Bernie Sanders or AOC go home and they're a secret Nazi," she said.

Original source:

Read at New York Post

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Let that sentence sit for a second. A member of the Democratic Socialists of America just said, on the record, that she'd have no problem with Bernie Sanders or AOC being secret Nazis in their private lives, as long as they vote the right way in public. That's not a gotcha clip taken out of context. That's the actual stated position: ideology in the home doesn't matter, only performance on the floor.

We've spent years being told that the left is the moral bulwark against extremism, that every stray tweet from the other side gets treated as evidence of a creeping fascist tide. Fine. Hold that standard. But apparently the standard has an asterisk, and the asterisk is "unless they caucus with us." If a Republican said they didn't care whether a colleague was secretly a Nazi at home as long as he voted for tax cuts, that clip would run on a loop for a month. Somehow this one is a shrug.

What this really reveals is how transactional a lot of modern progressive politics has become. Policy outcomes are the only currency that matters, and character, belief, even basic decency get waved off as irrelevant private matters. That's a strange place to land for a movement that built its entire brand on the idea that politics is personal, that words and beliefs have consequences, that silence is complicity. Apparently all of that was situational.

We don't think most rank-and-file Democrats agree with this. But it's worth noticing when the mask slips this cleanly, because it tells you something about where the incentives in that coalition actually point.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.