Egyptian Convicted For Supporting Muslim Brotherhood Is Funding El-Sayed’s Campaign
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
A guy sentenced to life in prison for backing the Muslim Brotherhood is now cutting checks for a Michigan Senate candidate. That's not a rumor from some fringe blog, it's the actual résumé of Mohamed Soltan, president of ACMER, who's shown up as a financial supporter of Abdul El-Sayed's campaign. You'd think that's the kind of donor a serious candidate distances himself from immediately, no statement needed, just hand the money back.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Democratic Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed’s campaign is facing renewed scrutiny after an Egyptian-American activist sentenced to life in prison in Egypt for alleged support of the Muslim Brotherhood in 2015 has emerged as a financial backer of his Senate bid.
Mohamed Soltan, 38, the president of the American Committee for Middle East Rights (ACMER),
Original source:
Read at Daily WireHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
A guy sentenced to life in prison for backing the Muslim Brotherhood is now cutting checks for a Michigan Senate candidate. That's not a rumor from some fringe blog, it's the actual résumé of Mohamed Soltan, president of ACMER, who's shown up as a financial supporter of Abdul El-Sayed's campaign. You'd think that's the kind of donor a serious candidate distances himself from immediately, no statement needed, just hand the money back.
Instead we get the usual shrug. Nobody's saying El-Sayed personally organized a Brotherhood cell in Dearborn. But voters are allowed to ask why a Senate nominee's fundraising network includes someone with this specific history, and they're allowed to be unsatisfied with silence as the answer. Campaigns vet their bundlers. That's not optional, it's the job.
Michigan has real stakes in this race, and Muslim Brotherhood ties aren't some abstract foreign policy footnote for a state with the political weight this community carries. If El-Sayed thinks Soltan's involvement is defensible, he should say so and explain why. If he thinks it's a problem, he should return the money and say that too. What he can't do is hope reporters lose interest and the story quietly disappears, because that's exactly the kind of move that makes people trust institutions less, not more.
We've seen this pattern before: a donor with an ugly paper trail, a campaign that goes quiet, and a press corps that treats the silence as sufficient. It shouldn't be. Voters in Michigan deserve a direct answer, not a dodge dressed up as no comment.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

