El Sayed rips effort to ‘cancel’ Piker after streamer exits Michigan campaign trail
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
Abdul El Sayed wants it both ways. He campaigned with Hasan Piker enough times to make it a habit, then quietly stepped back once the antisemitism criticism got loud enough to cost him votes, and now he's out there calling it a "cancel" attempt. That's not standing on principle.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Michigan Senate Democratic nominee Abdul el Sayed on Monday again defended Hasan Piker after publicly distancing himself from the Twitch streamer in the wake of concerns that he is antisemitic. El Sayed campaigned with Hasan Piker multiple times before clinching his party’s nomination in the state’s Aug. 4 primary.
As he took increasing flak from […]
Original source:
Read at Washington ExaminerHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Abdul El Sayed wants it both ways. He campaigned with Hasan Piker enough times to make it a habit, then quietly stepped back once the antisemitism criticism got loud enough to cost him votes, and now he's out there calling it a "cancel" attempt. That's not standing on principle. That's trying to eat your cake and complain about the crumbs.
Piker's record isn't some ambiguous gray area that got twisted by bad actors. The guy has a long trail of commentary that plenty of serious people, including Democrats, find genuinely alarming. El Sayed didn't discover that trail last week. He knew who he was sharing a platform with when it helped him during the primary. The distancing only showed up once the general election math changed and Jewish voters in Michigan started asking pointed questions.
Calling that a cancellation is a neat trick, though. It reframes a candidate's own strategic retreat as persecution, which conveniently lets him keep Piker's online audience sympathetic while telling everyone else he's had a change of heart. Pick one. Either the association was fine and he shouldn't have backed away, or it wasn't fine and he owes an actual explanation instead of a grievance narrative.
Michigan voters aren't obligated to buy the framing. A candidate who only discovers a problem once it becomes politically inconvenient hasn't really discovered anything. He's just noticed the polling.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

