Elaine Luria Is Campaigning on an Insider Trading Ban. She Once
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
You have to admire the timing. Elaine Luria is out there telling voters she wants to ban members of Congress from trading stocks, presenting herself as the clean-handed reformer. Meanwhile, the record shows the former Virginia congresswoman was busy buying and selling shares in companies that had business before the very committees she sat on.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

In Congress, itis hard to find a lawmaker willing to oppose a ban on insider trading, at least rhetorically. The idea is popular with voters, and members of Congress are usually happy to condemn it in public, even if their enthusiasm for real restrictions tends to arrive only after they leave office.
On occasion, that hypocrisy becomes impossible to miss.
Original source:
Read at TownhallHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
You have to admire the timing. Elaine Luria is out there telling voters she wants to ban members of Congress from trading stocks, presenting herself as the clean-handed reformer. Meanwhile, the record shows the former Virginia congresswoman was busy buying and selling shares in companies that had business before the very committees she sat on. The stock trades happened. The disclosure forms exist. And now she wants to run on the issue as if her own history doesn't exist.
She is campaigning on a rule she apparently couldn't be bothered to follow. It is a pretty simple standard: if you are going to write the law, you should at least respect the spirit of it while you are in office. Instead, we get the usual political theater. A ban on insider trading is a crowd-pleaser, so everyone in Washington nods along. But when the spotlight hits their own portfolio, the enthusiasm for accountability tends to cool off fast.
Democrats love to give speeches about ethics and transparency. They hold hearings, they draft bills, they pound the table about "restoring trust in government." Then a report like this lands, and the whole sermon collapses into the same swamp they claim to be draining. This is the part the left never wants to talk about: the rules are for the other guy. Luria wants to be the one holding the gavel, but her own conduct raises the exact questions she pretends to answer.
If she wants to make insider trading bans her campaign centerpiece, fine. But the burden is on her to explain why her past trades happened, not just promise she will do better next time. Voters in her district deserve a straight answer. The quickest way to drain the swamp is to stop electing the people who swim in it..
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

