Fox News Poll: Turek, Hinson in close Iowa Senate race
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
**Eleven points. ** That’s Josh Turek’s margin with independents in a state that hasn’t sent a Democrat to the Senate in going on a decade. If you’re looking for a reason this race is suddenly competitive, you don’t need to look further than your own grocery receipt.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Video Hinson fights for edge in tight Iowa Senate race Rep. Ashley Hinson, R-Iowa, joins ‘America Reports’ to discuss how inflation and the rising cost of living are shaping the state's closely watched Senate race.
Economic concerns and party loyalty are key factors shaping Iowa’s U.S. Senate matchup. A Fox News statewide survey of Iowa likely voters finds Democrat Josh Turek with a two-point edge over Republican Ashley Hinson, 49% to 47%, well within the margin of error.
Among registered voters, Turek is ahead by 4 points, 50% to 46%. That also falls within the range of sampling error and has been unchanged since June. The analysis below is based on likely voter results.
Democrats are more unified behind state representative Turek (96%) than Republicans are of current Congresswoman Hinson (87%). Independents favor Turek by two-to-one, and 10% of Republicans back him. It’s Iowa’s partisan structure that keeps the race tight, as more voters identify as Republicans than Democrats.
FOX NEWS POLL: MICHIGAN VOTERS SPLIT BETWEEN EL-SAYED AND ROGERS Iowa voters are split on control of the Senate : 49% prefer Democratic control and 48% favor Republican. With those numbers nearly matching the Senate matchup, both candidates are performing close to their party’s ceiling.
Turek is preferred by 11 points among women, 16 points in the suburbs, 17 points among voters with a college degree, and 32 points among independents. Hinson is up by 7 points among men, 6 points among those without a college degree, 14 points among rural voters, and 41 points among White evangelical Christians.
Economic pressure influences the contest. In the 2024 Fox News Voter Analysis, 3 in 10 Iowans described their families as falling behind financially. That share has risen to 4 in 10 today, and they back Turek by a 38-point margin.
Meanwhile, those holding steady (45%) and getting ahead (13%) favor Hinson (by 14 and 53 points respectively). FOX NEWS POLL: VOTERS QUESTION WHETHER AI'S PROMISE OUTWEIGHS ITS RISKS In addition, 6 in 10 say the cost of living will be extremely important to their Senate vote decision.
That outpaces other top issues, like President Donald Trump (43% extremely), immigration (39% extremely), and AI technology (27% extremely). Turek has the advantage among voters who say the cost of living, Trump, and AI technology are each extremely important to their vote, while voters prioritizing immigration favor Hinson.
Trump won Iowa with nearly 56% of the vote in 2024. Today, that’s how many Iowa voters disapprove of his job performance as president (57%), while far fewer, 42%, approve. The president’s ratings are only part of Hinson’s challenge.
While 42% view her positively, 50% have an unfavorable view, including nearly 4 in 10 who are "strongly" unfavorable. In contrast, Turek’s ratings are net positive: 48% favorable to 40% unfavorable (24% "strongly" unfavorable).
By a 9-point margin, more voters are concerned Hinson is too close to Trump than are worried Turek’s views are too liberal (52% vs. 43%). Among those "extremely" concerned, that gap widens to 14 points: 36% say Hinson is too tied to Trump, while 22% say Turek is too liberal.
More of Turek’s backers are certain of their choice: 88% are committed to him compared to 77% for Hinson. Twice as many Hinson supporters say they might change their mind (20% vs. 10%). "Recent history and the state’s partisan makeup suggest Hinson can pull this out," says GOP pollster Daron Shaw, who works on the Fox News Poll with Democrat Chris Anderson. "But the warning signs are clear: Iowa Republicans seem ambivalent, independents prefer Turek, and even her supporters say they aren’t sure." Iowa hasn't elected a Democrat to the Senate in 18 years (when Sen.
Tom Harkin won his final term), and it's been 20 years since they elected a Democrat as governor. In the Iowa governor’s contest , Democrat Rob Sand outperforms Republican Zach Lahn among likely voters by 53-44%.
The race has been steady since June. Sand’s lead comes not only from getting the support of nearly all Democrats (97%), but also 14% of Republicans and 66% of independents (vs. 16% of independents for Lahn).
Plus, 11% of voters backing Hinson for Senate switched parties to support Sand for governor. Conducted September 24-28, 2026, under the joint direction of Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R), this Fox News Poll includes interviews with a sample of 1,204 Iowa registered voters randomly selected from a statewide voter file.
Respondents spoke with live interviewers on landlines (183) and cellphones (733) or completed the survey online after receiving a text message (288). Results based on the registered voter sample have a margin of sampling error of ±2.5 percentage points and for the subsample of 1,008 likely voters it is ±3 percentage points.
Sampling error for results among subgroups is higher. In addition to sampling error, question wording and order can influence results. Sources for developing weight targets include the most recent American Community Survey, Fox News Voter Analysis, and voter file data.
Weights are generally applied to age, race, education, and area variables to ensure the demographics of respondents are representative of the registered voter population. Likely voters are based on a probabilistic statistical model that relies on past vote history, interest in the current election, intention to vote, age, education, race, ethnicity, and marital status.
Results among subgroups are only shown when the sample size is at least N=100. Fox News’ Victoria Balara contributed to this report. As head of the polling unit, Dana Blanton runs the Fox News Poll and oversees the Fox News Voter Analysis election survey.
Original source:
Read at Fox NewsHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Eleven points. That’s Josh Turek’s margin with independents in a state that hasn’t sent a Democrat to the Senate in going on a decade. If you’re looking for a reason this race is suddenly competitive, you don’t need to look further than your own grocery receipt.
Iowans are telling the pollsters what they tell us at the doorstep: the cost of living is the only issue that matters. It’s not the border, not foreign policy. It’s the economy, and the Democrats’ math doesn’t work anymore. The working-class coalition that used to default to the left is watching their paychecks get eaten alive by inflation and they’re asking hard questions about who’s actually responsible. Ashley Hinson has a solid record on cutting spending, but she’s running against a national headwind that doesn't care about her local votes. Washington's spending addiction is a brick tied to every Republican's ankle this cycle.
But let's be honest about the other side of the coin. Turek is running a smart, disciplined campaign. He’s not running as a national Democrat; he’s running as a local guy who understands the pressure on rural families. That’s why he’s grabbing the independents. The GOP’s closing argument has to be about the future, not just the last four years. Republicans would be fools to read this as a license to coast. The energy is there, but so is the frustration. Iowans want permission to trust us again on prices because right now, their wallets are telling them to try the other guy.
The winner here isn't going to be the one with the best ads. It’ll be the one who convinces the middle that they can actually fix the cost of a loaf of bread. If Hinson can tie Turek to the failed economic policies of his own party’s leadership, she walks away with this. If she lets him define himself as an independent outsider, she’s in for a long night. This race is a warning shot for the entire GOP conference in 2026. We win by focusing on the pocketbook, and we lose by relitigating the past. The data is on the table; the question is whether the campaign is listening.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

