From Fang Fang to Trump dossier, Eric Swalwell weighs in on sex-trap spycraft

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: Washington Times
1 min read
Why This Matters

The FBI sat a sitting congressman down and told him he'd been cultivated by a Chinese intelligence asset. That's not a rumor from a partisan podcast. That's a classified briefing, on Capitol Hill, about the man himself.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

From Fang Fang to Trump dossier, Eric Swalwell weighs in on sex-trap spycraft
Image via Washington Times

Rep. Eric Swalwell, a new member of the House Select Committee on Intelligence in April 2015, sat down for a classified briefing from the FBI on Capitol Hill. The briefing was about him.

Original source:

Read at Washington Times

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

The FBI sat a sitting congressman down and told him he'd been cultivated by a Chinese intelligence asset. That's not a rumor from a partisan podcast. That's a classified briefing, on Capitol Hill, about the man himself. And now here's Swalwell, years later, weighing in on the general subject of "sex-trap spycraft" like he's some neutral analyst on the topic rather than a case study in it.

There's something almost admirable about the nerve involved. Most people who get warned by their own government that a foreign agent was working them would quietly slink away from the beat. Swalwell went on to sit on the Intelligence Committee for years, campaign for president, and become one of the loudest voices lecturing the country about foreign influence operations against other people. The Fang Fang relationship wasn't some ancient footnote either. It ran for years, overlapped with his rise in California politics, and only came fully into public view because reporters dug it out, not because he volunteered it.

We're not interested in relitigating every detail of what did or didn't happen between them. What's worth pointing out is the sheer comfort with which Washington absorbs stories like this and moves on. A briefing that would end most careers barely dented his. Now he gets to write himself back into the narrative as a commentator on spycraft, dossiers, and foreign entanglement, as if the FBI hadn't already had that exact conversation with him personally.

If accountability in this town depended on getting caught, Swalwell would have been finished a decade ago. Instead he's still in the room, still talking, and apparently still confident nobody's going to ask him the obvious follow-up question.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.