Georgetown, Did Anyone Tell You That Students Are Organizing a Gross Contest Involving Charlie Kirk

Conservative principles face implementation challenges as policy meets political complexity.

Source: Townhall
1 min read
Why This Matters

A look-alike contest for a man who was shot to death in front of a crowd of college kids doing exactly what Kirk spent his career doing, showing up and taking questions. That's the part that should stop everyone cold. This isn't a roast of a politician's gaffe or a mock debate.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Georgetown, Did Anyone Tell You That Students Are Organizing a Gross Contest Involving Charlie Kirk
Image via Townhall

We’re approaching the one-year anniversary of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The conservative activist was assassinated by Tyler Robinson at Utah Valley University in Orem on September 10, during his hallmark question-and-answer open forum with students.

In response, students at Georgetown University held a Charlie Kirk look-alike contest. The school has condemned the event while denying that any such sanctioned contest will take place (via NY Post):

Original source:

Read at Townhall

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

A look-alike contest for a man who was shot to death in front of a crowd of college kids doing exactly what Kirk spent his career doing, showing up and taking questions. That's the part that should stop everyone cold. This isn't a roast of a politician's gaffe or a mock debate. It's mimicking the appearance of someone who was murdered less than a year ago, organized by students at one of the more prestigious universities in the country.

Georgetown's response is the part that actually deserves scrutiny. The school says no "sanctioned" event will happen, which is a very careful way of saying nothing at all. Sanctioned by whom? Student groups organize things on campus constantly without needing the administration's blessing, and everyone involved knows that. If the university genuinely found this as repugnant as its statement suggests, the answer isn't a semantic dodge, it's saying plainly that any student caught participating in a mockery of a murdered man's image will face consequences.

We've seen this movie before. A conservative figure becomes the punchline, the university issues a statement that sounds tough but commits to nothing, and by next week everyone's moved on except the people who had to watch their friend or colleague turned into a costume gag. Kirk spent years debating college kids face to face, which is more engagement with hostile audiences than most of his critics ever attempted. Whatever anyone thought of his politics, that's not nothing.

What happened to him should be treated as the tragedy it was, not raw material for a campus bit. Georgetown can either mean what it said or it can keep hiding behind the word "sanctioned." Students will notice the difference, and so will everyone else watching how these places actually behave when it's inconvenient to take a real stand.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.