GOP chair of Georgia Peanut Commission backs Ossoff for Senate

Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.

Source: The Hill
1 min read
Why This Matters

One Republican peanut farmer does not a trend make, but it’s worth asking why Donald Chase decided to back Jon Ossoff. Chase told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that “we don’t necessarily elect a party. ” That’s a fair sentiment, as far as it goes.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

GOP chair of Georgia Peanut Commission backs Ossoff for Senate
Image via The Hill

The Republican chair of the Georgia Peanut Commission is backing Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff (Ga.) in his bid for a second full term. “We don’t necessarily elect a party,” commission Chair Donald Chase told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “I like to support people that I can get behind and believe in.” Chase, whom board members elected

Original source:

Read at The Hill

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

One Republican peanut farmer does not a trend make, but it’s worth asking why Donald Chase decided to back Jon Ossoff. Chase told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that “we don’t necessarily elect a party.” That’s a fair sentiment, as far as it goes. But it’s a strange thing to hear from the GOP chair of the Georgia Peanut Commission. Ossoff has voted with Joe Biden’s agenda nearly every time he’s had the chance. That agenda has been rough on farmers, ranchers, and anyone who prices fuel or fertilizer. We’d love to hear what Ossoff offered Chase, because the public record doesn’t show much affection for agriculture policy that helps the little guy.

The predictable reaction from the left is to treat this as a grand rebuke of the Republican Party. It isn’t. It’s one man’s personal decision and nothing more. Party labels exist for a reason. They tell you how a senator will vote on taxes, trade, and the regulatory meat grinder that hits rural America hardest. Ossoff may be friendly in person. But his voting card is what matters in Washington, and it reads like a rubber stamp for the Democratic leadership. Chase is entitled to support whoever he wants. We just think he’s getting a bad deal.

If there’s a lesson here, it’s for Georgia Republicans. The state party shouldn’t assume that conservative governance sells itself. People like Chase need to be shown the receipts, not just told who to vote for. The GOP’s candidate has to make the case that he’ll eat lunch with peanut farmers in Cochran, not just show up for a photo at the auction barn. Loyalty to a party isn’t loyalty to a person. But trust has to be earned with more than a label. We hope Chase’s choice wakes up some folks back home. Then they can spend the next two years proving him wrong.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.