Head of Top California Med School Couldn't Say This Biological Fact During a Congressional Hearing
Parents assert authority over curriculum as education policy becomes a defining cultural battleground.
A dean of a major medical school sat in front of Congress and could not bring himself to say what a man is. Not some trick question, not a philosophical trap. A basic biological definition that any first-year anatomy student could rattle off in his sleep.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Amy mentioned this yesterday, but Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) wasn’t the only member of Congress shocked when a top medical administrator and professional couldn’t state basic biological facts. What’s even more appropriate is that this occurred during a hearing about how DEI language harms medical science.
Original source:
Read at TownhallHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
A dean of a major medical school sat in front of Congress and could not bring himself to say what a man is. Not some trick question, not a philosophical trap. A basic biological definition that any first-year anatomy student could rattle off in his sleep. And he froze, because saying it plainly might have violated some unwritten campus rule about language and identity that has nothing to do with treating patients.
The setting makes it almost too perfect. This was a hearing about whether DEI-speak is corrupting how doctors are trained and how medicine gets practiced. Then the very witness brought in to reassure everyone that science is still science couldn't answer a question a sixth grader could handle. That's not an accident. That's what happens when institutions spend years training people to hedge, qualify, and dodge anything that sounds "insensitive" instead of just being accurate.
Patients don't benefit from a doctor who's been trained to treat plain facts as landmines. Biology doesn't get more complicated because a hearing room makes people nervous about optics. If the leadership of a top medical school can't say a sentence that used to be uncontroversial in any textbook, that tells you something about what's been prioritized on campus, and it isn't rigor.
This isn't really about one dean having a bad moment under hot lights. It's about an entire professional class that's been taught reflexive evasion is safer than honesty. Randy Fine didn't ask a gotcha question. He asked the obvious one, and the answer should have taken five seconds. That it didn't is the whole story.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

