House Confronts Iran, Russia, Impeachment Ahead of Midterms
European security questions expose tensions between alliance obligations and American interests.
Washington always saves the spiciest fights for the last week before voters start showing up. Now the House is sprinting through a four day session with three hot buttons on the table: sanctions on Russia, talk of impeachment, and President Trump’s Iran campaign, plus a new twist we’re all going to feel in our monthly bills. **They want a last-minute drama, not a last-minute fix.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

The House is back in Washington for its final week before the November midterm elections, with lawmakers set to confront three politically charged issues before heading home to campaign: rising energy costs tied to data centers, sanctions on Russia, and President Donald Trump’s war in Iran.
The four-day session gives lawmakers one last opportunity to […]
Original source:
Read at Washington ExaminerHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Washington always saves the spiciest fights for the last week before voters start showing up. Now the House is sprinting through a four day session with three hot buttons on the table: sanctions on Russia, talk of impeachment, and President Trump’s Iran campaign, plus a new twist we’re all going to feel in our monthly bills. They want a last-minute drama, not a last-minute fix.
The weirdest part is how “rising energy costs” is being waved around like a mystery. The coverage points to data centers, which is a polite way of saying we’re building a power-hungry digital economy and then acting shocked when the grid strains and prices jump. Congress can either get serious about more reliable generation and transmission, or keep throwing talking points at the meter while families and small businesses eat the cost. If you can’t keep the lights cheap, everything else gets harder.
On Russia, sanctions are fine when they’re real and enforced, not when they’re a press release designed to look tough on cable news. We’ve watched years of “historic” packages that somehow leave plenty of room for loopholes, friendly middlemen, and selective enforcement depending on who’s in the crosshairs politically. If lawmakers want credit, they should spell out what changes, who gets hit, and how it’s policed, and then stick around long enough to oversee it.
And then there’s impeachment chatter hovering over Trump’s actions in Iran. The country can handle a debate about strategy and goals. What it can’t handle is turning every foreign policy decision into a pre-election impeachment audition. Voters aren’t asking for another round of performative outrage. They’re asking whether America is safer, whether our allies and enemies are clearer-eyed about our resolve, and whether Congress is doing its job instead of trying to do the voters’ job for them. Impeachment talk is the left’s favorite substitute for winning elections..
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

