House GOP passes $95B budget proposal on party lines to fund Iran war and other Trump priorities
Fiscal discipline faces political resistance as debt accumulation threatens future generations.
Ninety-five billion dollars and not a single Democrat vote. That tells you almost everything about where this Congress is right now. House Republicans pushed through a budget proposal to fund the Iran war and a handful of other White House priorities, and they did it entirely on their own, with even a few of their own members balking.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

The House adopted a Republican-only $95 billion budget proposal, a long-shot effort to fund the Iran war and other White House priorities over objections from Democrats and a few GOP holdouts.
Original source:
Read at New York PostHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Ninety-five billion dollars and not a single Democrat vote. That tells you almost everything about where this Congress is right now. House Republicans pushed through a budget proposal to fund the Iran war and a handful of other White House priorities, and they did it entirely on their own, with even a few of their own members balking. That's not a coalition. That's a dare.
We get the impulse. If you believe the Iran situation requires resources now, waiting around for bipartisan buy-in feels like a luxury nobody can afford. But funding a war through a party-line vote is a strange kind of commitment. Wars fought with unified national resolve tend to go better than wars fought as a partisan project that the other side is rooting to see fail. When Democrats have zero ownership of the spending, they also have zero incentive to defend it once things get expensive or messy, and things involving Iran tend to get both.
The GOP holdouts matter here too. When members of your own party won't sign onto your war funding, that's not just noise to be managed. It's a signal that the case hasn't actually been made to the people footing the bill. Ninety-five billion is real money, and "trust us, other priorities are in here too" is not exactly a receipt.
Passing something on paper isn't the same as building the kind of support that survives a long fight. If this is going to be the funding mechanism for a real war, it deserves more than a straight-line party vote and a shrug toward the skeptics.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

