LA brute learns fate for chucking concrete rocks at federal
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
Three years in prison for chucking chunks of concrete at a federal officer during an anti-ICE riot sounds, to some people, like a harsh sentence. It isn’t. It’s a reminder that you don’t get to dress up violence as “activism” and expect a judge to wink at it.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
A violent Southern California rock-thrower was slapped with three years behind bars on Friday after assaulting an officer during an anti-ICE riot.
Original source:
Read at New York PostHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Three years in prison for chucking chunks of concrete at a federal officer during an anti-ICE riot sounds, to some people, like a harsh sentence. It isn’t. It’s a reminder that you don’t get to dress up violence as “activism” and expect a judge to wink at it. Concrete isn’t a protest sign. It’s a weapon, and everyone watching those riots knew exactly what it was meant to do.
The most telling part is how routine this has become in Southern California: the same playbook, the same excuses, the same “mostly peaceful” fog machine rolled out whenever the target is immigration enforcement. We’re supposed to pretend federal agents are fair game because the cause is fashionable. No. If you assault an officer, you’re not making a point. You’re trying to hurt someone and intimidate the rest.
Three years also isn’t some grand victory lap. It’s the bare minimum for restoring a little fear of consequences. The country can’t function if mobs get to decide which laws are enforceable and which public servants can safely do their jobs. If activists want to argue about ICE policy, fine, welcome to America. But the moment concrete starts flying, the argument is over, and cuffs should follow. Order isn’t optional when you don’t like the law..
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.