Maine Democrats running to replace Platner as Senate nominee scramble to woo his voters
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
Graham Platner went from Maine Democrats' great progressive hope to "the disgraced oysterman" in about the time it takes to shuck a bag of littlenecks. That phrase alone tells you how fast this fell apart, and now the party is left holding a Senate nomination nobody quite wants to touch but everybody needs to inherit. What's actually happening here is a scramble to keep Platner's voters without keeping Platner.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

The tight timeline to replace former Maine Senate nominee Graham Platner has left Democratic hopefuls scrambling to woo his progressive base while trying to turn the focus from the disgraced oysterman to defeating Republican Sen.
Susan Collins in November.
Original source:
Read at Washington TimesHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Graham Platner went from Maine Democrats' great progressive hope to "the disgraced oysterman" in about the time it takes to shuck a bag of littlenecks. That phrase alone tells you how fast this fell apart, and now the party is left holding a Senate nomination nobody quite wants to touch but everybody needs to inherit.
What's actually happening here is a scramble to keep Platner's voters without keeping Platner. That's a neat trick if you can pull it off. His base didn't show up because they loved the Democratic Party establishment. They showed up because he wasn't the establishment, or at least played the part well enough. Now the same apparatus that was lukewarm on him is trying to convince his supporters that whoever gets anointed next carries the same energy. Voters tend to notice when they're being handed a substitute and told it tastes the same.
And all of this is happening because Susan Collins is still standing there, four-term incumbent, having outlasted every wave that was supposed to take her out. Maine Democrats keep telling themselves this is finally the cycle. Instead they're going to spend the next stretch relitigating why their handpicked guy imploded rather than making a case against her record.
There's a lesson in here that goes beyond Maine. When a party outsources its enthusiasm to a candidate it never fully vetted, it ends up paying for it twice: once in the scandal, and once in the scramble to pretend the scandal didn't happen.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

