Outrage as disgraced California official may get $400K severance after sending raunchy texts

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: New York Post
1 min read
Why This Matters

Oakland is about to hand a city administrator roughly $400,000 to go away after he got caught sending raunchy texts about female colleagues. Not for doing his job well. Not for some legal settlement forced by a court.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Outrage as disgraced California official may get $400K severance after sending raunchy texts
Image via New York Post

Oakland’s top administrator had resigned over inappropriate text messages about female colleagues.

Original source:

Read at New York Post

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Oakland is about to hand a city administrator roughly $400,000 to go away after he got caught sending raunchy texts about female colleagues. Not for doing his job well. Not for some legal settlement forced by a court. Just because that's apparently how the contract was written, and now the city council gets to shrug and say their hands are tied.

This is the part of municipal government nobody votes for but everybody pays for. Someone, at some point, negotiated a severance package generous enough that getting caught disrespecting your coworkers in writing barely dents your payout. Nobody in that room was thinking about the taxpayer. They were thinking about protecting the next executive who might also need a soft landing someday, because that's the club these people belong to.

Oakland has real problems. Crime, homelessness, a budget that's been creaking for years. And the response to a guy resigning in disgrace is to write him a check that could fund actual services for actual residents. The outrage in the story isn't manufactured. It's the correct reaction to watching a city that claims to have no money find plenty of it for the wrong person at the wrong moment.

If there's a lesson here, it's not really about one administrator's bad judgment with a phone. It's about who writes these contracts, who approves them, and why "disgraced" and "$400,000" keep showing up in the same sentence in city government. That's the story worth someone actually digging into, long after this guy has cashed the check and moved on.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.