Postal Service chief confirms Trump mail-in ballot security work

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: Washington Examiner
1 min read
Why This Matters

So the Postmaster General told the AP that the agency has "stopped" work on the computer system designed to verify ballots, and when asked about it, he essentially shrugged and said, "We're not doing anything. " That quote tells you everything you need to know about why this is stalled. Here's what was supposed to happen.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Postal Service chief confirms Trump mail-in ballot security work
Image via Washington Examiner

The chief of the U.S. Postal Service confirmed the agency has stopped its work on implementing a computer system that would have verified mail-in ballots for the midterm elections under an executive order from President Donald Trump.

In a Thursday interview with the Associated Press, Postmaster General David Steiner said “we’re not doing anything” because […]

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

So the Postmaster General told the AP that the agency has "stopped" work on the computer system designed to verify ballots, and when asked about it, he essentially shrugged and said, "We're not doing anything." That quote tells you everything you need to know about why this is stalled.

Here's what was supposed to happen. Under a Trump executive order, the Postal Service was developing a way to match mail-in ballots against voter rolls before they ever got counted. It's not rocket science. It's the kind of verification you'd think everyone would want, especially after 2020, when states pushed through emergency changes without much scrutiny. The point was never to stop anyone from voting. The point was to catch the ballots that show up after Election Day or from people who shouldn't be casting one in the first place.

But now it's parked. The agency is hiding behind operational concerns, and Congress isn't pushing. That's convenient for Democrats, who've spent three years treating any attempt to secure elections as a threat to democracy. The left's legal campaign against this order was never about states' rights. It was about preserving a system where mail ballots are harder to audit, easier to submit late, and the window for challenges is a mess. If verifying a ballot is controversial, we've already lost the plot. We're not asking for much. We're asking for the same confidence that your bank has when you deposit a check. This isn't about suppressing votes. It's about ensuring each valid one counts and no invalid ones slip through. Every day this project collects dust, the trust gap widens, and the excuses get thinner.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.