Trump administration proposes stripping tax-exempt status from schools using race-based programs
Tax policy debates center on growth versus redistribution as Americans weigh economic freedom.
the federal government is telling private schools that if you want the tax break, you don't get to sort kids by race for special programs. That's it. That's the proposal.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

The Trump administration proposed new regulations to strip the tax-exempt status of private schools if they offer targeted programs supporting specific racial groups.
Original source:
Read at Fox NewsHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
the federal government is telling private schools that if you want the tax break, you don't get to sort kids by race for special programs. That's it. That's the proposal. And somehow it's being treated like a bombshell.
Here's the thing people keep dodging. Tax-exempt status isn't a blank check. It comes with strings, and one of the oldest strings in the book, going back to the Bob Jones University case in the 1980s, is that you don't get to discriminate on race and still enjoy a subsidy from every taxpayer in the country. For decades that logic was aimed squarely at schools accused of excluding minority students. Now it's being applied to schools running programs that carve kids out by race in the other direction, and suddenly the same principle feels controversial to people who cheered it before. Funny how that works.
Private schools can still run whatever programming they want. Nobody's raiding a campus. What they can't do is have it both ways, collect the tax break meant for institutions serving the public broadly while also operating race-specific tracks that treat students differently based on skin color. If a school thinks that arrangement is worth losing the exemption over, that's a choice they're free to make. But pretending this is some unprecedented assault on private education ignores that the rule already existed. It's just finally being enforced in a direction some people didn't expect.
What's actually being tested here isn't the schools. It's whether "no racial discrimination" was ever meant as a universal rule or just a one-way street. We think it should mean what it says, for everybody, all the time.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

