Trump Brushes Off $40,000,000,000,000 Gov’t Debt Crisis, Claims US Economy Can Grow Its Way Out Of Spiraling Spending Problem
Economic uncertainty forces tough choices between short-term relief and long-term stability.
Forty trillion dollars is not a number most people can actually picture, and that's part of the problem with how this whole debate gets covered. The headline treats "growth" as some kind of hand-wave, a dodge from a president who doesn't want to deal with the real numbers. But growth is not a dodge.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

‘the way you take care of debt is with growth’
Original source:
Read at Daily CallerHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Forty trillion dollars is not a number most people can actually picture, and that's part of the problem with how this whole debate gets covered. The headline treats "growth" as some kind of hand-wave, a dodge from a president who doesn't want to deal with the real numbers. But growth is not a dodge. It's the only mechanism that has ever actually worked. You don't shrink a debt that size through austerity theater or by squeezing a few billion out of foreign aid. You grow the denominator. That's not spin, it's arithmetic.
That said, saying it and doing it are different animals. Reagan said it. Clinton got the growth and a surplus followed, mostly because spending discipline showed up alongside it. Growth without any restraint on the spending side just means you're running faster on a treadmill that keeps speeding up. If this White House wants "grow our way out" to be more than a talking point, it needs to be paired with something on the spending side that isn't just promises, because right now the deficit trajectory isn't cooperating with the growth trajectory no matter how good jobs numbers look on a given month.
The deeper issue is that nobody in Washington, in either party, has been honest about entitlement spending and interest payments eating the budget alive. Interest on the debt alone is now competing with defense spending. That's not a talking point, that's a line item. Brushing off the topline number is bad optics, sure, but the real failure would be treating growth as a substitute for a plan rather than one half of one.
We'd take a president who believes in growth over one who thinks the answer is higher taxes and more spending dressed up as investment. But belief isn't a policy. At some point this administration needs to show the math, not just the confidence.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

