Trump likely violated due process by revoking media outlets’

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: Washington Examiner
1 min read
Why This Matters

Tiana Lowe Doescher is probably right, and it's worth saying plainly: the White House's decision to pull credentials from three outlets is likely to get slapped down in court. That's not a criticism of the president's instincts. It's a recognition of how the administrative state works, and how the courts have treated these fights before.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Trump likely violated due process by revoking media outlets’
Image via Washington Examiner

Washington Examiner economics columnist Tiana Lowe Doescher said President Donald Trump’s decision to revoke credentials for three media outlets likely will not hold up in court. “Trump tried to do this in 2018 when he wanted to revoke fake news Jim Acosta’s hard pass,” Doescher said Monday on Newsmax’s The Right Squad. “And what the […]

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Tiana Lowe Doescher is probably right, and it's worth saying plainly: the White House's decision to pull credentials from three outlets is likely to get slapped down in court. That's not a criticism of the president's instincts. It's a recognition of how the administrative state works, and how the courts have treated these fights before. The 2018 attempt to pull Jim Acosta's pass collapsed almost immediately, and the legal reasoning hasn't gotten any friendlier since then.

But here's the thing nobody in the mainstream coverage wants to admit. The press corps has spent years acting less like a check on power and more like an extension of the Democratic Party's communications shop. When the White House finally treats them like the partisan players they've become, the reaction is pure shock and outrage. They want to be treated as neutral arbiters of truth while producing coverage that reads like opposition research. You don't get to pick and choose when you're a neutral institution. The president is responding to a press culture that abandoned any pretense of objectivity a long time ago.

That doesn't mean the approach is smart. The White House just handed the media a martyrdom narrative. They'll run this story on a loop for weeks, and it gives them an excuse to avoid covering the actual policy wins that are happening. If the goal is to expose bias, there are better ways to do it than giving outlets a court case they can win. Let the administration make its point through surrogates, through independent media access, through the obvious contrast between how they're treated and how the Trump administration's actual record is covered. Fighting this in federal court is not the battlefield to pick.

Still, we'd be lying if we said we don't understand the frustration. The press is not an innocent party here. They've earned every ounce of skepticism thrown their way. But winning the argument means choosing the right fights. This one was always going to be decided by a judge, and that's not a venue where the administration has much leverage. Use the bully pulpit. Make the case to the public. Just don't hand the opposition a legal victory they'll use to pretend they're victims.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.