Trump says ‘Scott Jennings is good’ for Leavitt position after CNN anchor’s courting
Constitutional questions test judicial philosophy as Americans debate the role of unelected judges.
Scott Jennings defending Natalie Harp on CNN, of all places, is the kind of moment that tells you more about the state of media than any press conference could. Here's a guy who built his career on a conservative network's rival channel, sitting across from anchors who spend most of their airtime rolling their eyes at this administration, and he just... says the true thing.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

President Donald Trump told reporters on Friday that conservative commentator Scott Jennings is a “good option” to replace outgoing press secretary Karoline Leavitt after the CNN contributor jumped to support the administration in a media storm over the president’s top aide, Natalie Harp.
Trump was asked about possible candidates to take on Leavitt’s role, who […]
Original source:
Read at Washington ExaminerHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Scott Jennings defending Natalie Harp on CNN, of all places, is the kind of moment that tells you more about the state of media than any press conference could. Here's a guy who built his career on a conservative network's rival channel, sitting across from anchors who spend most of their airtime rolling their eyes at this administration, and he just... says the true thing. No hedging, no "on the other hand." That's apparently rare enough now that it gets you floated for press secretary.
What's telling is why Trump noticed. It wasn't a policy paper or a debate performance. It was Jennings refusing to play along with a manufactured pile-on, in real time, on a stage where the safe move is usually to nod along with the narrative. Trump rewards that instinct because he's watched plenty of Republicans wilt the second a hostile camera turns on them. Jennings didn't wilt.
Whether he actually wants the job, or whether it even happens, is almost beside the point. The signal Trump is sending is pretty simple: he wants someone at that podium who won't flinch, who understands that half the questions in that room are traps dressed up as journalism, and who can hold a line without sounding like they're reading from a script written by a nervous communications shop. Leavitt did that job well. Whoever follows her needs the same spine.
We'd also just note the obvious irony here. CNN spent Harp's controversy trying to make an example out of the administration, and instead helped audition its next spokesman.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

