Trump’s teleprompter operator on leave over $100K insider betting report: White House

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: New York Post
1 min read
Why This Matters

Somebody standing a few feet from the President of the United States, reading his words before the rest of us hear them, turned that access into six figures on a betting market. That is the story, stripped of spin. It doesn't matter whether you think prediction markets are a fun new toy or a legalized casino.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Trump’s teleprompter operator on leave over $100K insider betting report: White House
Image via New York Post

The longtime operator of Trump's prompter won more than $100,000 on prediction market Kalshi based off the commander in chief's remarks, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday.

Original source:

Read at New York Post

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Somebody standing a few feet from the President of the United States, reading his words before the rest of us hear them, turned that access into six figures on a betting market. That is the story, stripped of spin. It doesn't matter whether you think prediction markets are a fun new toy or a legalized casino. If you know what the president is about to say before it airs, and you can put money on the market's reaction to it, you are not gambling. You are cashing a check the rest of us aren't allowed to write.

The White House put the guy on leave, which is the right first move, but it's not the whole answer. Nobody in that building seems to have asked the obvious question ahead of time: what happens when a staffer with real-time knowledge of presidential remarks starts trading on platforms built to price exactly that kind of news? This wasn't a foreign adversary sneaking around the National Security Council. It was someone on payroll, doing something that apparently nobody thought to prohibit until it already happened.

We'd have a lot more patience for "it's under review" if this were the first time a White House got caught flat-footed by a problem it should have seen coming. Prediction markets are only going to get bigger and faster, and any staffer with foreknowledge of a market-moving statement is a walking conflict of interest. This should have been in the ethics briefing on day one, not something HR discovers after a reporter starts asking about a suspiciously good winning streak.

Fix the rule, not just the guy who broke it. Bar staff with advance knowledge of presidential remarks from trading on markets tied to those remarks, full stop, and say so out loud. Anything less just invites the next person in that chair to try the same trade and bet that nobody's watching.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.