Why Would an 'Anti-Corruption' Democrat Take Money From Sexual
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
Josh Turek wants Iowa to believe he is the anti-corruption candidate. So why is he taking campaign money from a donor with a history of sexual harassment? That question answers itself.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Iowa Democrat Senate candidate Josh Turek has made government corruption a central focus of his campaign. So why would he accept money from donors accused of sexual abuse? While speaking to the Des Moines Register Political Soapbox event, he said, “I say all the time, we can have oligarchy or we can have democracy, but we cannot have both.” He added, “And right now, what we have is we have outsize influence from billionaires and large corporations that are buying off the political process.” Part of his platform is overturning the Citizens United ruling, passing the DISCLOSE ACT, and imposing term limits, “Because members of Congress should be accountable to their constituents, to the people, not just to the billionaires, donors and lobbyists.” Another $20 million.
That's what a super PAC just announced they're dropping into this race to try to defeat me. They're scared. They know Iowans are fed up with the self-serving corruption in Washington from politicians like my opponent, and they're spending millions to stop… pic.twitter.com/Nr1A0R5Bu9 Yet, Turek has taken money from some rather questionable sources.
Jamie Horowitz, former President of Fox Sports, donated $3,500 to the candidate’s campaign. He was fired from his position in 2017 after he was accused of sexually harassing multiple women, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Jamie Horowitz’s dismissal Monday came about a week after Fox began investigating allegations of sexual harassment in the workplace in its sports division. The company interviewed several women at L.A.-based Fox Sports about Horowitz’s behavior, according to a person familiar with the investigation who was not authorized to publicly discuss it.
The women included prominent on-air personalities and show producers, according to two people who requested anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the investigation. “Everyone at Fox Sports, no matter what role we play, or what business, function or show we contribute to — should act with respect and adhere to professional conduct at all times,” Fox Sports President Eric Shanks said in an email to staff members, announcing Horowitz’s departure. “These values are non-negotiable,” he said.
There’s also John Doerr, a tech investor who also donated $3,500 to Turek’s campaign. His name showed up on email chains with Jeffrey Epstein. John Doerr, an early tech investor and California-based venture capitalist, has made two contributions of $3,500 to Ossoff's 2026 campaign, for a total of $7,000.
Doerr was listed on email chains with Epstein from John Brockman, who hosted events with 'sumptuous dinners [and] exclusive conferences… for the rich, the smart, and the powerful,' per the Department of Justice.
The candidate has also taken money from family members of billionaire mega-donor Georgoe Soros, who also appeared in the Epstein files. If Turek is so serious about rooting out corruption in government, why would he willingly accept money from people who are corrupt?
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting exposing the radical left and woke media? Support our work so we can keep bringing you the truth.
Original source:
Read at TownhallHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Josh Turek wants Iowa to believe he is the anti-corruption candidate. So why is he taking campaign money from a donor with a history of sexual harassment? That question answers itself. Either Turek didn't know enough about the man he’s now in business with, or he knew and decided the cash was worth the risk. Neither option looks like reform.
Campaign finance is full of unsavory characters, sure. But this isn’t some obscure PAC bundler. It’s a person whose behavior was serious enough to become a political problem. Turek built his whole campaign around cleaning up government. Then he takes the exact kind of money he says poisons politics. That’s not corruption fighting. That’s corruption arithmetic.
Voters can handle a candidate with flaws. What they can’t handle is a guy who treats them like they won’t notice. If Turek wanted to prove he meant what he said, he could have given the money back. He didn’t. He kept the check and kept the lecture. Iowa noticed anyway..
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

