Ayanna Pressley: Trump administration, Supreme Court, and MAGA are ‘united in their collective harm’

Constitutional questions test judicial philosophy as Americans debate the role of unelected judges.

Source: Washington Examiner
1 min read
Why This Matters

Ayanna Pressley has a formula and she's sticking to it: take three separate institutions, the executive branch, the judiciary, and a political movement of roughly seventy million people, and flatten them into one word, "fascist," so the whole thing fits on a protest sign. It's not analysis. It's a mood.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Ayanna Pressley: Trump administration, Supreme Court, and MAGA are ‘united in their collective harm’
Image via Washington Examiner

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) criticized the “fascist” Trump administration, the “far-right” Supreme Court, and the Make America Great Again movement, saying they are all “united in their collective harm.”  “I’m very confident that people understand the high stakes of this moment, and they are very clear about the fact that the people who mean us […]

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Ayanna Pressley has a formula and she's sticking to it: take three separate institutions, the executive branch, the judiciary, and a political movement of roughly seventy million people, and flatten them into one word, "fascist," so the whole thing fits on a protest sign. It's not analysis. It's a mood.

Here's what actually happened this week, if you want specifics instead of adjectives: an elected administration governing on the platform it ran on, a Supreme Court issuing rulings that Pressley happens to dislike, and a political coalition that keeps winning elections she'd rather it lose. Calling that "collective harm" isn't a critique of policy, it's a refusal to argue about policy at all. You don't need to explain why a tariff or a ruling or an executive order is wrong if you've already decided the people behind it are enemies of the country.

This kind of talk used to get pushback even from Democrats who thought "fascist" should mean something. Now it's just the house style. The trouble is that language like this doesn't stay contained to cable hits and campaign fundraising emails. When you tell millions of Americans that their vote, their movement, their entire political identity is a form of violence against the republic, you're not raising the alarm. You're giving people permission to stop seeing their neighbors as fellow citizens with different opinions.

We'd take the "high stakes of this moment" line more seriously if it came with an actual argument attached. It didn't. It came with a label, and labels are cheap. They cost the person using them nothing and they cost the country plenty.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.