Commentary: The Social Security cut no one is talking about
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
The familiar framing is that Social Security is “insolvent,” so the only grown-up answer is a grand bargain that quietly trims benefits and moves on. That skips a basic question: why is Washington always allowed to drift into crises and then demand hurried sacrifice from the people who played by the rules. Conservatives don’t oppose reform.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
As Social Security speeds toward insolvency, it's time for our leaders to compromise and save it for ourselves and future generations.
Original source:
Read at Orlando SentinelHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The familiar framing is that Social Security is “insolvent,” so the only grown-up answer is a grand bargain that quietly trims benefits and moves on. That skips a basic question: why is Washington always allowed to drift into crises and then demand hurried sacrifice from the people who played by the rules.
Conservatives don’t oppose reform. We oppose reforms that treat seniors like a line item while Congress refuses to touch the drivers of the problem: unchecked spending, an economy that punishes work, and a program design that pretends demographics don’t matter. A real fix starts with fiscal honesty, protecting earned benefits, and fairness to workers who were promised something specific.
If leaders want public buy-in, they should show institutional accountability and make reforms transparent, gradual, and anchored in long-term stability, not another elite compromise that lands hardest on families with the least leverage.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.