Darline Graham Breaks With Her Late Brother On Another Key Issue
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
Lindsey Graham spent years defending the filibuster like it was the last load-bearing wall in the Capitol. Darline Graham looked at that wall Monday night and said knock it down. That's not a subtle break with her brother's legacy, that's a full renovation, done live on a debate stage in a primary where every word gets replayed for a year.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Sen. Darline Graham (R-SC) on Monday called for eliminating the Senate filibuster to pass the SAVE America Act, breaking with the position held by her late brother, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). During a Republican primary debate Monday night, Graham argued that Republicans should abolish the 60-vote threshold rather than wait for Democrats to do so
Original source:
Read at Daily WireHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Lindsey Graham spent years defending the filibuster like it was the last load-bearing wall in the Capitol. Darline Graham looked at that wall Monday night and said knock it down. That's not a subtle break with her brother's legacy, that's a full renovation, done live on a debate stage in a primary where every word gets replayed for a year.
Here's the thing though: she's not wrong that the old argument has gotten stale. Republicans have watched Democrats threaten to nuke the filibuster every time they're one seat away from doing it themselves, then act shocked when anyone on the right suggests getting there first. If the SAVE America Act is worth passing, and Graham clearly believes it is, then betting your agenda on Senate Democrats staying disciplined for six more years is not a strategy. It's a hope.
But there's a reason her brother held the line even when it cost him. The filibuster isn't just an obstacle when you're in the minority, it's insurance for when you are. Blow it up to pass one bill and there's nothing stopping the next Democratic majority from using the same hole in the wall to pass whatever they want, faster and with less negotiating than ever. That's the trade nobody likes to say out loud in a primary debate.
Graham may be right that the current setup is unsustainable. She should still be honest with voters that "abolish it before they do" is not a principle, it's a race to the bottom, and once you're in that race there's no getting back out.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

