Dem reactions within moments of Austin ICE shooting spark viral

Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.

Source: Fox News
1 min read
Why This Matters

The first body camera footage out of Austin is difficult to watch, but it gives us something the pile-on crowd never bothered with: a sequence of events. We see why officers approached the man, and we can see the moments before the shooting unfolded. That footage is raw, and it does not match the instant narrative that Democrats in Texas launched within minutes of the news breaking.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Dem reactions within moments of Austin ICE shooting spark viral
Image via Fox News

Austin Texas Democrats face backlash for attacking ICE before any investigation into the shooting of a suspected illegal immigrant was completed.

Original source:

Read at Fox News

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

The first body camera footage out of Austin is difficult to watch, but it gives us something the pile-on crowd never bothered with: a sequence of events. We see why officers approached the man, and we can see the moments before the shooting unfolded. That footage is raw, and it does not match the instant narrative that Democrats in Texas launched within minutes of the news breaking. They had their verdicts ready before the shell casings were cold.

The reactions from local Democratic officials were less about seeking truth and more about performing outrage. They talked about an "unarmed" man and demanded immediate accountability, leaning on a story that has not been told yet. Here is the uncomfortable fact they keep ignoring: this was a suspected illegal immigrant with a lengthy criminal history, including prior violent offenses. The cartoon version is not evidence. It is a campaign ad. Rushing to condemn the police before the facts are out is not courage, it’s a tell. They are betting their political future on the assumption that the cops are always wrong, and the crowd online will cheer them for it.

There is a difference between asking hard questions and passing judgment with zero information. Asking questions is part of the job. Declaring the officer guilty is a choice, and it is a reckless one that makes the next officer think twice before acting in a dangerous situation. It also does a disservice to the victims of crime who rely on police to stop repeat offenders. We expect due process for the accused, but we seem to have abolished it for the accused’s suspected crimes. That standard is backwards.

The fact that this shooting took place in Texas, a border state absorbing the consequences of failed federal policy, makes the rush to judgment even more cynical. If the investigation shows a bad shoot, the system will handle it. But if it shows a lawful use of force, the damage is already done. The reputation of a good officer is trashed, and a dangerous person is turned into a martyr. We should wait for the ballistics and the witness statements. Hate is not evidence. And neither is the feverish social media feed that Democrat operatives are stoking tonight.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.