Ex-Arizona lawmaker who questioned election integrity to be sentenced for using forged signatures
Election integrity questions persist as states navigate federal mandates and voter confidence.
link “questioning election integrity” to personal misconduct, as if skepticism itself is the story. Forged signatures are serious, but it’s a category error to treat one person’s alleged wrongdoing as a referendum on legitimate concerns about how elections are run. If the facts show fraud, then prosecution is appropriate.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
A former Republican lawmaker who questioned the integrity of Arizona’s elections and served as a leader for the conservative group Turning Point Action is scheduled to be sentenced Tuesday for using nominating petitions that contained forged signatures
Original source:
Read at ABC NewsHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
link “questioning election integrity” to personal misconduct, as if skepticism itself is the story. Forged signatures are serious, but it’s a category error to treat one person’s alleged wrongdoing as a referendum on legitimate concerns about how elections are run.
If the facts show fraud, then prosecution is appropriate. Conservatives should be the first to say that rules apply to everyone, especially in politics. But the public also deserves reporting that separates individual accountability from the broader question of whether systems are transparent, auditable, and worthy of confidence.
What’s at stake is public trust and the rule of law, not a media morality play. Real integrity means clean ballots and clean petitions, enforced consistently, without using a conviction to silence debate.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.