Fauci’s fed-up wife flips the bird as ex-top doc miserably takes out trash hours after contempt vote

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: New York Post
1 min read
Why This Matters

Christine Grady flipping off a photographer while her husband hauls out the recycling is either the most human moment of this entire saga or the most fitting one, depending on how tired you are of Anthony Fauci by now. Either way, it's a strange image to end up as the visual shorthand for a man who spent four years being introduced as the nation's foremost expert on infectious disease. Take out the trash, indeed.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Fauci’s fed-up wife flips the bird as ex-top doc miserably takes out trash hours after contempt vote
Image via New York Post

Dr. Anthony Fauci looked downright miserable Thursday after a Senate committee voted to hold him in contempt for refusing to answer questions about his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Original source:

Read at New York Post

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Christine Grady flipping off a photographer while her husband hauls out the recycling is either the most human moment of this entire saga or the most fitting one, depending on how tired you are of Anthony Fauci by now. Either way, it's a strange image to end up as the visual shorthand for a man who spent four years being introduced as the nation's foremost expert on infectious disease. Take out the trash, indeed.

The contempt vote itself matters more than the gesture, even if it'll get a fraction of the attention. Senators didn't invent questions about gain-of-function funding, the six-foot rule that wasn't based on much of anything, or the origins of a virus that shut down the country for the better part of two years. Those questions have been sitting there since 2021, and Fauci's answer has mostly been to not answer them, or to answer them in ways that later needed revising. A contempt finding is a serious thing. It's not a tweet or a cable panel take. It means a body of the United States Senate formally decided a witness stonewalled it.

What's telling is the reaction split. To a lot of people, that Senate vote is the story: an unaccountable bureaucrat who steered pandemic policy for the entire country finally facing something resembling consequences, even a symbolic one. To Fauci's defenders, the story is a tabloid photo of his wife's middle finger, because that's easier to be outraged about than gain-of-function grants. That's not an accident. It's a lot more comfortable to relitigate a paparazzi shot than to sit with the fact that millions of Americans still don't have straight answers about decisions that reshaped their lives.

Fauci looking miserable isn't the takeaway here, and neither is his wife's temper. The takeaway is that a man who once told Congress he represented "the science itself" still won't square up to the people he answered to for a living. That's what deserves the scrutiny, trash day or not.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.