God, Country and the American Story: Why faith still belongs in American government
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
A congressman who used to preach on Sundays now makes his case on the House floor, and somehow that's treated as the exotic part of his biography. It shouldn't be. For most of this country's history, the pulpit and public office weren't opposite ends of a career, they were often the same job worn on different days of the week.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Congressman Mark Harris shares the remarkable journey that took him from the pulpit to Congress, explains why he believes Christians shouldn't retreat from public life, and responds to one of America's biggest debates: Does faith belong in government?
Original source:
Read at Washington TimesHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
A congressman who used to preach on Sundays now makes his case on the House floor, and somehow that's treated as the exotic part of his biography. It shouldn't be. For most of this country's history, the pulpit and public office weren't opposite ends of a career, they were often the same job worn on different days of the week. Mark Harris walking that path isn't a novelty act. It's a return to something normal that got treated as strange somewhere along the way.
The retreat argument he's pushing back against is worth sitting with, because it's not really about the Constitution. Nobody serious thinks government should be run by a denomination. The actual argument, dressed up in neutral language, is that people of faith should keep their convictions in their pocket once they walk into public life, as if belief is fine for Sunday and disqualifying on Monday. That's not secularism. That's asking half the country to show up to their own government with one hand tied behind their back.
Harris isn't asking for a theocracy, he's asking for the freedom to bring his whole self to the job, the same freedom granted without a second thought to every other worldview that shapes how politicians vote. Nobody demands that a Congressman raised on secular humanism leave that framework at the door. The double standard is the story here, not faith itself.
What's refreshing is that he's not arguing this defensively, like it's a liability to explain away. He's arguing it as the reason he ran in the first place. That confidence, more than any policy line, is probably what unsettles people who'd rather faith stay quietly in the pews where it's easier to ignore.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

