Hillary Clinton Warns Socialists About Label That Could Haunt Them
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
Hillary Clinton is out here warning her own party that the "socialist" label is politically radioactive, and honestly, credit where it's due, she's not wrong. She's just about eight years too late to the party and roughly zero percent likely to be heeded by the people she's talking to. When the most establishment Democrat alive is telling Abdul El-Sayed's wing of the party to watch their branding, that tells you something real is happening inside that coalition, and it isn't unity.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is warning Democrats that Republicans’ “anti-communist” messaging could sink socialist candidates and jeopardize the party’s chances of retaking control of Congress.
During a podcast appearance with liberal tech journalist Kara Swisher, Clinton raised concerns about the electability of Abdul El-Sayed, who narrowly defeated establishment-backed Rep. Haley Stevens in Michigan’s heated
Original source:
Read at Daily WireHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Hillary Clinton is out here warning her own party that the "socialist" label is politically radioactive, and honestly, credit where it's due, she's not wrong. She's just about eight years too late to the party and roughly zero percent likely to be heeded by the people she's talking to. When the most establishment Democrat alive is telling Abdul El-Sayed's wing of the party to watch their branding, that tells you something real is happening inside that coalition, and it isn't unity.
What's funny is Clinton isn't making a moral argument here. She's not saying socialism is bad policy or that command economies have a track record littered with breadlines. She's making a purely tactical point: swing voters hear "socialist" and run the other way, so maybe don't hand Republicans a gift-wrapped attack ad. That's the whole warning. It's Politics 101, and it's revealing that it needs to be said out loud on a podcast in the first place.
The deeper problem for Democrats is that El-Sayed didn't lose to Haley Stevens, he beat her, in a primary, with establishment money behind Stevens and none of it working. That's not a fringe candidate slipping through a crack. That's the base picking the label Clinton is nervous about. She can warn all she wants, but the people who nominated him already made their choice, and no amount of Kara Swisher podcast diplomacy is going to talk them out of it before November.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.