How is Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill changing US taxes and healthcare in 2026?
Tax policy debates center on growth versus redistribution as Americans weigh economic freedom.
that any shift away from Washington-designed subsidies is automatically a hardship story. It treats expiring healthcare assistance and tighter food aid requirements as a moral failure, instead of asking whether temporary programs were quietly becoming permanent entitlements without an honest vote. What’s missing is the conservative concern about **public trust**.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Big changes are coming in the new year as healthcare subsidies expire and requirements for food assistance take effect.
Original source:
Read at Al JazeeraHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
that any shift away from Washington-designed subsidies is automatically a hardship story. It treats expiring healthcare assistance and tighter food aid requirements as a moral failure, instead of asking whether temporary programs were quietly becoming permanent entitlements without an honest vote.
What’s missing is the conservative concern about public trust. If benefits are sold as short-term, they should not be extended by inertia and bureaucratic habit. Work requirements are not punishment; they are an attempt at fairness for taxpayers and a signal that aid is a bridge, not a destination.
Tax changes should be judged the same way: do they reward productive investment, reduce compliance games, and keep the U.S. competitive? In 2026, the real test is rule of law and institutional stability. A system that relies on cliff-edge deadlines and emergency extensions is not compassionate. It is unserious.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.