ICE deports illegal migrant pardoned by Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz after child sex assault, Rubio says
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
Tou Lue Vang got a pardon from Tim Walz for a child sex assault conviction. Then he got a plane ticket out of the country courtesy of Marco Rubio. That's the sequence, and it tells you almost everything you need to know about how differently the state of Minnesota and the federal government are treating this man's presence here.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a video posted to X that he had revoked Tou Lue Vang's legal status earlier this week following his clemency receipt June 10.
Original source:
Read at New York PostHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Tou Lue Vang got a pardon from Tim Walz for a child sex assault conviction. Then he got a plane ticket out of the country courtesy of Marco Rubio. That's the sequence, and it tells you almost everything you need to know about how differently the state of Minnesota and the federal government are treating this man's presence here.
Walz's clemency board doesn't owe anyone a public explanation for why they thought this particular case deserved mercy, but the rest of us are allowed to ask the question anyway. A pardon wipes away the legal consequences of a crime. It does not wipe away the fact that a child was assaulted, and it does not somehow convert someone with no legal immigration status into someone who's earned the benefit of the doubt. Rubio's team looked at the same file and came to a completely different conclusion: this is a guy who should not be here, pardon or no pardon.
What's notable is how fast this moved once it left Minnesota's hands. State-level clemency processes can take months of hearings, letters, and deliberation. Federal immigration enforcement, when it wants to act, apparently doesn't need any of that. Vang was gone within days of receiving his pardon. That contrast should embarrass anyone who thinks state pardon boards are the last word on who deserves to stay in this country.
Governors get to run their own clemency systems, and voters get to judge them for it. But immigration status isn't a state's call to make, and this case is a clean example of why that separation exists. A pardon can erase a sentence. It can't erase judgment, and it clearly didn't erase the federal government's.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

