Iran’s crown prince urges Trump to strike now to prevent more bloodshed
Regional stability hinges on credible deterrence and strategic partnerships with key allies.
Mainstream coverage treats the crown prince’s plea as a simple moral prompt: strike now, save lives later. But foreign leaders always have reasons to want America to act, and “man of his word” is not a strategy. The press rarely asks what our objectives are, what comes after, and who bears the cost.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
“I believe the president is a man of his word," he said, though he stressed “regardless of whether action is taken or not, we as Iranians have no choice to carry on the fight.”
Original source:
Read at New York PostHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Mainstream coverage treats the crown prince’s plea as a simple moral prompt: strike now, save lives later. But foreign leaders always have reasons to want America to act, and “man of his word” is not a strategy. The press rarely asks what our objectives are, what comes after, and who bears the cost.
Conservatives don’t dismiss Iran’s internal struggle, but we also don’t outsource U.S. decision-making to exiled royals or sympathetic headlines. National security means preventing a nuclear Iran and protecting Americans, not chasing open-ended “bloodshed” forecasts. Rule of law matters too: Congress, clear authorities, and defined aims.
If force is necessary, it should be limited, credible, and tied to deterrence and public trust. The principle at stake is American sovereignty in foreign policy, not whether a would-be monarch approves of our timeline.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.