Israel says it has serious concerns with Hamas disarmament deal
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
Israel raising red flags on a Hamas disarmament deal within days of Trump announcing it tells you almost everything you need to know about how thin the ground under this agreement actually is. This isn't some outside critic sniping from the cheap seats. This is the country that has to live next door to Gaza, the one that just spent two years fighting Hamas block by block, saying quietly to Washington that the fine print doesn't hold up.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Israel has shared "serious security concerns" with the White House regarding the proposed disarmament deal with Hamas, an Israeli official told The Associated Press on Sunday in some of the first public comments since U.S.
President Donald Trump announced the agreement earlier this week.
Original source:
Read at Washington TimesHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Israel raising red flags on a Hamas disarmament deal within days of Trump announcing it tells you almost everything you need to know about how thin the ground under this agreement actually is. This isn't some outside critic sniping from the cheap seats. This is the country that has to live next door to Gaza, the one that just spent two years fighting Hamas block by block, saying quietly to Washington that the fine print doesn't hold up. That should worry anyone who wanted this deal to actually work rather than just look good in a headline.
Disarming a terrorist organization on paper is easy. Doing it in a way that can't be reversed, gamed, or slow-walked is the hard part, and it's the part that always gets glossed over when a deal gets announced with fanfare. Hamas has spent nearly two decades rebuilding tunnels and rocket stockpiles after every previous round of "disarmament" and ceasefire theater. Israel knows that history better than any diplomat drafting language in Washington, and if their security services are flagging specific concerns rather than just posturing, that's a signal worth taking seriously.
None of this means the deal is doomed or that diplomacy was the wrong move. It means the details matter more than the press conference did. An agreement that looks strong in the announcement but weak in the verification mechanism isn't peace, it's a pause with better branding. If the administration wants this to be more than that, it needs to actually address what Israel is raising instead of treating the criticism as an inconvenience to the victory lap.
We'd rather see this get fixed now, quietly, than watch it unravel publicly six months from now with Americans wondering why nobody listened to the one ally who had the most reason to get it right.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

