Jeffries thwarts the Left, opposes ending all aid to Israel
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
he did the math and figured out that torching aid to a democratic ally to appease the loudest wing of his conference wasn't worth the headache. That's not courage, that's just reading the room. But it's still notable, because it tells you how far the argument has traveled inside the Democratic Party that "should we fund Israel's embassy operations" is even a floor vote question in 2024.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) announced Tuesday that he will oppose an amendment aiming to cut off aid to Israel. In a letter to his colleagues, Jeffries wrote that the amendment, introduced by Rep.
Thomas Massie (R-KY), is “overly broad” and could limit “humanitarian aid, refugee resettlement, peace-building and U.S. embassy operations.” The Democratic […]
Original source:
Read at Washington ExaminerHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
he did the math and figured out that torching aid to a democratic ally to appease the loudest wing of his conference wasn't worth the headache. That's not courage, that's just reading the room. But it's still notable, because it tells you how far the argument has traveled inside the Democratic Party that "should we fund Israel's embassy operations" is even a floor vote question in 2024.
Massie's amendment was the kind of thing that sounds principled in a press release and falls apart the second you read the fine print. Jeffries is right that it's "overly broad," lumping in humanitarian aid and refugee resettlement with military assistance like it's all one line item to be zeroed out in protest. That's not policy, that's a mood being dressed up as legislation. Massie gets to cast himself as some libertarian truth-teller while ignoring that the amendment would have hit programs that have nothing to do with the war Gaza critics are actually angry about.
What's worth watching is the coalition this keeps forcing into the open. A Kentucky Republican and a chunk of the progressive left, both willing to use a blunt instrument on Israel policy because it plays well with their respective bases. Jeffries stopping it isn't some profile in courage, it's the bare minimum of not letting fringe theatrics become official Democratic policy. The fact that it needed stopping at all is the actual story here.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

