MAGA-Curious CBS Boss Gave Trump’s War Partner ‘60 Minutes’ Reins
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
The Daily Beast frames this CBS episode as proof of “MAGA-curious” corruption, as if the real scandal is that a foreign leader negotiated basic interview terms. That’s a familiar move: treat process complaints as a substitute for grappling with the substance of a dangerous region. Conservatives should be clear-eyed about two things at once.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
MIKE BLAKE / REUTERS CBS News Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss gave Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the choice of his interviewer for a 60 Minutes segment that aired on Sunday. Weiss, a self-described “Zionist fanatic,” allowed Netanyahu to pick either 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl or CBS News Chief Washington Correspondent Major Garrett to interview him, according to The New York Post .
Netanyahu opted for Garrett, who is not a 60 Minutes correspondent. Weiss’ offer was reportedly part of an effort to secure the interview with the Israeli leader, who is the subject of an International Criminal Court arrest warrant for alleged war crimes in Palestine.
Netanyahu also successfully pitched President Donald Trump, 79, on starting the war against Iran. Read more at The Daily Beast.
Original source:
Read at The Daily BeastHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The Daily Beast frames this CBS episode as proof of “MAGA-curious” corruption, as if the real scandal is that a foreign leader negotiated basic interview terms. That’s a familiar move: treat process complaints as a substitute for grappling with the substance of a dangerous region.
Conservatives should be clear-eyed about two things at once. First, major networks need public trust. Letting any head of government pick an interviewer invites suspicion, even if editors do it to land a sit-down. Second, America’s priority is national security, not European court politics. The ICC’s posture may animate activists, but it does not bind U.S. policy.
If CBS wants credibility, it should defend editorial independence with consistent rules and full transparency. And if the press wants to critique Israel or Trump, it should do it on facts, not insinuations. The principle at stake is institutional integrity in a moment when credibility is already scarce.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.