Mark Harris introduces bill moving key K-12 and college functions from Education Department to Labor

Parents assert authority over curriculum as education policy becomes a defining cultural battleground.

Source: Washington Examiner
1 min read
Why This Matters

Mark Harris picked a boring name for a bill that would actually change how Washington touches your kid's classroom, and that's kind of on brand for how this whole effort has gone. Nobody in Washington wants to say "abolish the Department of Education" out loud anymore, so instead you get "Less Bureaucracy, Better K-12 Education. " Fine.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Mark Harris introduces bill moving key K-12 and college functions from Education Department to Labor
Image via Washington Examiner

EXCLUSIVE — A new House Republican bill aims to move forward with President Donald Trump‘s plan to dismantle the Department of Education by shifting responsibilities to other agencies. Rep. Mark Harris (R-NC), a freshman member of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, is introducing the “Less Bureaucracy, Better K-12 Education” and “Less Bureaucracy, […]

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Mark Harris picked a boring name for a bill that would actually change how Washington touches your kid's classroom, and that's kind of on brand for how this whole effort has gone. Nobody in Washington wants to say "abolish the Department of Education" out loud anymore, so instead you get "Less Bureaucracy, Better K-12 Education." Fine. Call it whatever you want. What matters is the mechanics: shifting K-12 and higher ed functions over to Labor is a real attempt to do what Trump has been promising since his first term, not just another press release that goes nowhere.

The case for this isn't complicated. The Education Department doesn't teach anyone anything. It funnels money, writes rules, and generates compliance paperwork that local districts then spend half their budget managing. Student outcomes have not exactly justified the department's existence since it was created in 1979. Reading and math scores are stagnant or worse in plenty of states, and nobody can point to a decade where the federal layer made things demonstrably better. Meanwhile Labor already runs workforce and apprenticeship programs, so tying K-12 and higher ed functions to actual job pathways instead of a standalone bureaucracy isn't a crazy idea. It's arguably more honest about what education is supposed to produce.

The skeptics will say this is just chaos dressed up as reform, that you can't reorganize decades of federal education policy through a press release from a freshman congressman. That's a fair worry about execution, not a defense of the status quon. Financial aid, IDEA protections, civil rights enforcement in schools, all of that has to land somewhere functional or this becomes a mess that hurts kids and families instead of helping them.

Still, the instinct here is right. Washington built an entire cabinet department around education and can't show its work. A freshman from North Carolina forcing that conversation, instead of letting it die in some subcommittee, is worth paying attention to.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.