Max Miller’s lawyer admits accidentally sharing shirtless photo of embattled GOP rep’s 2-year-old daughter
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
A shirtless photo of a two-year-old ending up in a legal filing is the kind of mistake that makes you wonder how many eyes were actually on this document before it went out. Aaron Minc says it was unintentional, and we're inclined to believe him, honestly. Lawyers attach the wrong exhibit, paralegals grab the wrong file from a folder, these things happen in offices that move too fast.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Lawyer Aaron Minc claimed that including the photo was "completely unintentional and a mistake."
Original source:
Read at New York PostHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
A shirtless photo of a two-year-old ending up in a legal filing is the kind of mistake that makes you wonder how many eyes were actually on this document before it went out. Aaron Minc says it was unintentional, and we're inclined to believe him, honestly. Lawyers attach the wrong exhibit, paralegals grab the wrong file from a folder, these things happen in offices that move too fast. But when the subject is a toddler and the context is her father's messy, high-profile legal fight, "mistake" doesn't make the exposure disappear. The photo is out there now.
That's the part that should bother people more than the finger-pointing over whose desk it fell off of. Max Miller's daughter didn't sign up for any of this. She's two. Whatever you think of the congressman, his politics, or the underlying dispute that put lawyers in a room drafting filings in the first place, none of that touches her. Kids get dragged into their parents' battles constantly in Washington and in courtrooms everywhere, but there's usually at least a paper wall between them and the public record. Here that wall got knocked down by carelessness, not malice, and the distinction matters less to the family than it might to the lawyers explaining it away.
We'd like to think this prompts some actual process changes at that firm rather than just a statement and a quiet correction. Redaction protocols exist for a reason. When a filing touches a minor, especially a very young one, there should be more than one set of eyes checking what's attached before it's filed. This wasn't a hostile leak or a smear campaign, and we're not going to pretend it was to score a point. It was sloppiness with real consequences, and that's still worth calling out plainly.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

