Network Newscasts Continue to Shield Democrats During DHS Shutdown
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
The network coverage treats the DHS shutdown like a weather event: inconvenient, mysterious, and mostly caused by Trump’s temperament. That framing quietly edits out the key fact voters need to judge this mess: Democrats chose a funding fight that targets core enforcement agencies, then ask to be graded on their empathy for TSA. Conservatives see a basic problem of **accountability in budgeting**.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
As the DHS-only government shutdown rages on, the Elitist Media’s broadcast network newscasts continue to work overtime to shield the Democrats from accountability over their role in creating the shutdown in the first place.
This dirty work is being performed as security lines worsen across the nation’s airports. Consider this portion to close ABC’s report on World News Tonight. President Trump is framed here as the intransigent party, with Democrats simply wanting to bring reforms to the agency: WATCH: the broadcast network evening newscasts continue to shield Democrats from responsibility for the ongoing TSA shutdown.
ABC News newly frames President Trump as the intransigent party, as opposed to the Democrats that insisted on defunding DHS. OSUNSAMI: Republicans had... pic.twitter.com/3C...
Original source:
Read at NewsbustersHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The network coverage treats the DHS shutdown like a weather event: inconvenient, mysterious, and mostly caused by Trump’s temperament. That framing quietly edits out the key fact voters need to judge this mess: Democrats chose a funding fight that targets core enforcement agencies, then ask to be graded on their empathy for TSA.
Conservatives see a basic problem of accountability in budgeting. You cannot applaud “reforms” while using paychecks and airport security as leverage. If ICE and Border Patrol are the political target, say so plainly and own the consequences instead of outsourcing blame to a chyron about “intransigence.”
This is not just about lines at Atlanta or O’Hare. It is public trust and national security. DHS is not a campus committee; it is the machinery that screens travelers and enforces the border.
The principle at stake is governing responsibly: fund essential security functions cleanly, argue policy separately, and stop treating enforcement as optional when it becomes inconvenient.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.