Can diplomacy end the conflict between Thailand and Cambodia?

How We See It: Diplomacy's Limitations in Southeast Asia

The recent headlines tout a historic meeting between Thailand and Cambodia as a turning point for regional peace. While diplomacy is undeniably a necessary tool, this optimistic framing overlooks deeper underlying issues that both countries must confront. Superficial agreements often mask longstanding grievances, and without addressing national interests, any progress risks being shaky at best.

Conservative perspectives emphasize the importance of national sovereignty and self-determination. These nations should prioritize addressing their domestic challenges over external pressures to conform to a particular diplomatic narrative. Only through genuine engagement rooted in mutual respect can sustainable solutions emerge.

Ultimately, the principle at stake is institutional stability. Effective diplomacy can foster dialogue, but it cannot replace the fundamental need for robust governance and public trust within each nation. Until this ground is solid, any peace is likely to remain elusive.